Help Shape Better Discovery Workflows
Research conversations with Florida plaintiff PI attorneys and firm owners
Owlmark is conducting short, non-sales conversations to understand how discovery actually moves from litigation intake through client follow-up, attorney review, production, service, and supplementation. The goal is to learn before building.
WHO THIS RESEARCH IS FOR
Solo and small Florida plaintiff personal injury firms that actively litigate cases and manage written discovery internally.
Perspectives especially helpful:
• Firm owners and partners
• Plaintiff PI litigation attorneys
• Litigation managers
• Senior litigation paralegals
• Firms with approximately one to five attorneys
• Firms using any case-management system
Different workflows, firm sizes, and experiences are welcome. The goal is to understand how the process varies, not to confirm one preferred method.
WHAT WE’LL DISCUSS
We will focus on how discovery works inside your firm today.
• What happens when defense discovery arrives
• How work is assigned and tracked
• What staff spend the most time chasing
• What the attorney reviews or fixes
• How production is reconciled
• How supplementation is monitored
• What would break if a key team member left
We are interested in the real process, including workarounds and problem areas.
WHAT TO EXPECT
• Approximately 15 minutes
• Phone or video conversation
• No preparation required
• No sales presentation
• No request for client names
• No confidential case information
• No commitment to purchase or test anything
The purpose is to understand current practice before Owlmark builds any tools around it.
Participate in the Research
If you are a Florida plaintiff PI attorney, firm owner, litigation manager, or senior paralegal, I would value 15 minutes of your perspective. Please do not include client names or confidential case information.